A D V E R T I S E M E N T


LOCALLY OWNED BY PAMPLIN MEDIA GROUP

Sustainable Life
Loading

Printer-friendly version     Email story link

Green Dilemmas: Cow’s milk vs. soy milk

(news photo)

© 2010 Dreamstime

ADVERTISEMENTS

Quick: What’s Oregon’s official beverage?

Take a seat at the back if you blurted out "beer." And sorry, Stumptown aficionados, but you’re out if you picked coffee.

Actually, it’s milk, as wholesome as Mom and apple pie, brought to you locally by the farmers of Tillamook County and beyond. An idyllic American tableau, right?

Wrong, say an increasingly vocal number of consumers. They’ve turned instead to soy milk, citing its environmental and health benefits.

But compare them side-by-side and things get as murky as a glass of you-know-what.

Dairies: more brown than green

Ardent dairy proponents concede that cows are not Mother Nature’s best friends. They belch greenhouse gas-causing methane, and their poop contaminates local water sources. They tramp around and cause river erosion. And they eat and eat and eat – often animal feed treated with pesticides or chemical fertilizers.

Some cows are treated with antibiotics to bulk them up, says Natalie Reitman-White of Organically Grown, a Eugene fruit and vegetable wholesaler. The antibiotics get passed on to people, she says, who can develop a resistance to antibiotics.

Organic dairies – a growing Oregon industry – have fewer environmental impacts. They forswear the use of antibiotics and bovine-growth hormone and pledge to provide pastureland for the animals to graze.

Still, Cornell University studies showed that producing a kilogram of soybean milk uses less fossil fuel than producing a kilogram of cow’s milk. 

Soybeans not so benign

Soybeans aren’t the greenest of products, either. When milk comes from a cow, it looks like it looks in the bottle, save for pasteurization. Soybeans need to be ground and processed before they start to become milk, and ingredients must be added – water, vitamins, sugars, and, especially, calcium. Some of those components may come from halfway around the world.

Demand for soybeans has shot up in recent years, and farmers in South America, backed by giant American corporations like Cargill and Monsanto, have responded by tearing out acres upon acres of Amazon rainforest to plant soybeans, leading to an enormous loss of biodiversity and carbon absorption. Soybeans need minimal tending, so the new fields haven’t even translated into many jobs.

Soybean farmers may use heavy amounts of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer, Reitman-White says. All that fertilizer can run off into rivers and contribute to ocean dead zones, bad news for marine life.

Finally, soy milk cartons are tough and expensive to recycle, though they are accepted at the curbside locally. Cow’s milk cartons and jugs, on the other hand, are nearly universally recyclable. Or you can save them to make a vessel for the milk-carton boat races in next year’s Rose Festival.

Advantage: A tough call, but we’ll go with soy milk, unless you're talking about expensive organic milk raised locally and humanely. Then the balance tips to cow’s milk.

Taste



1 | 2 Next Page >>


Digg Del.icio.us
StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumbleupon Reddit

Political Oregon


Portland Tribune
Beaverton Valley Times
Boom NW
Clackamas Review
Estacada News
Forest Grove News Times
The Outlook Online
The Lake Oswego Review
Oregon City News Online
Sandy Post
The Bee
Sherwood Gazette
Spotlight News
SW Connection
Tigard Times
West Linn Tidings


Link to online subscription form

Link to The Regal Courier

Find a paper

Enter a street name
or a 5 digit zip code


Browse archive



Link to KPAM


Weather Forecasts
Weather Maps
Weather Radar Video forecast


ADVERTISEMENTS






SPECIAL SECTIONS
AND PROMOTIONS

Web hosting


Link to Special Publication


Link to Special Publication

Contact Us Classifieds Sustainable Life Sports Features Opinion News